Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
133-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

133-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032408 50.865243)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032294 50.865231,-1.032299 50.865253,-1.032315 50.865273,-1.032340 50.865290,-1.032371 50.865300,-1.032407 50.865304,-1.032442 50.865301,-1.032474 50.865291,-1.032499 50.865275,-1.032516 50.865255,-1.032522 50.865233,-1.032517 50.865211,-1.032501 50.865190,-1.032476 50.865174,-1.032445 50.865164,-1.032409 50.865160,-1.032374 50.865163,-1.032342 50.865173,-1.032317 50.865189,-1.032300 50.865209,-1.032294 50.865231)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL